As generative AI becomes ubiquitous among students, educators are rapidly overhauling how they teach and test. Teachers report a surge in AI-enabled cheating and are shifting to in-class writing, oral exams and lockdown-browser quizzes to curb misuse. At the same time, universities are issuing more explicit guidance, acknowledging that blanket bans are untenable and that unclear rules have led to unintentional violations and messy enforcement. UC Berkeley urged faculty to spell out permitted uses, while Carnegie Mellon flagged a rise in academic-integrity cases and the limits of AI detection tools. The debate now centers less on whether students will use AI and more on defining acceptable assistance—editing, translating, summarizing—versus impermissible outsourcing, as schools seek to integrate AI literacy without eroding standards.































